THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION AND FREEDOM OF RELIGION: CASE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

L. Yarmol, I. Tuchapets
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Full text PDF180.87 KB
Abstract: 
In the paper is analyzed general theoretical provisions on the right to education and (or) secular education as a component of freedom of religion. Examined the features of the protection of the right to education and freedom of religion by the European Court of Human Rights and its importance to the practice of law in Ukraine.
References: 

1. “Appel’-Irhanh ta inshi proty Nimechchyny.” [Appel-Irrgang and Others v. Germany] vid 6 zhovtnya 2009 r. Rishennya Yevropeys’koho sudu z prav lyudyny (zayava № 45216/07). Available at: http://hudoc. echr. coe. int. 2. Harazha M. M. Svit·s’kyy dyskurs yak linhvistychnyy fenomen: sut’, spetsyfika, perspektyvy doslidzhennya. [Secular discourse as a linguistic phenomenon: the nature, specificity, research prospects]. Visnyk Dnipropetrovs’koho universytetu. Seriya Movoznavstvo Publ, 2011, T. 19, vyp. 17(3), pp. 30-38. Available at: http://nbuv. gov. ua/UJRN/vdumo_2011. 3. “Hzhelak proty Pol’shchi.” [Grzelak v. Poland] vid 15 chervnya 2010 r. Rishennya Yevropeys’koho sudu z prav lyudyny (zayava № 7710/02). Available at: http://hudoc. echr. coe. int. 4. “Dozhan proty Nimechchyny” [Dojan and Others v. Germany] vid 13 veresnya 2011 r. Rishennya Yevropeys’koho sudu z prav lyudyny vid (zayava # № 319/08). Available at: http://hudoc. echr. coe. int. 5. “K“yel’dsen, Busk Madsen i Pedersen proty Daniyi.” [Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark] vid 7 hrudnya 1976 r. Rishennya Yevropeys’koho sudu z prav lyudyny (zayavy NN 5095/71, 5920/72, 5926/72). Available at: http://hudoc. echr. coe. int. 6. Kovalenko Lesya. Do problem relihiynoyi osvity u svit·s’kiy derzhavi. [The problems of religious education in secular state] Available at: http://risu. org.ua/ua/index/expert_thought/analytic/8897/. 7. Kovrovs’kyy, I. H. Pedahohichnyy ta pravovyy aspekty vyznachennya ponyattya “svit·s’ka osvita.” [ Teaching and legal aspects of the definition of “secular education”]. Nauka. Relihiya. Suspil’stvo, 2008, №1, pp. 228-233. Available at: http://dspace. nbuv. gov.ua/handle/ 123456789/29275http:// hudoc. echr. coe. int. 8. Kozyrev F. Relyhyoznoe obrazovanye v svet·skoy shkole [Religious education in secular schools.]. SPb., Apostol’skyy horod Publ, 2005. pp. 636. 9. “Laut·si proty Italiyi.” [Lautsi v. Italy] vid 18 travnya 2011 r. Rishennya Yevropeys’koho sudu z prav lyudyny (zayava № 30814/06). Available at: http://hudoc. echr. coe. int. 10. Mel’nychenko N. O. Spivvidnoshennya pryntsypu svit·s’kosti osvity ta prava na otrymannya relihiynoyi osvity u konstytutsiynomu zakonodavstvi krayin-chleniv Yevropeys’koho Soyuzu. [Relation between the principle of secular education and the right to religious education in the constitutional law of the Member States of the European Union]. Aktual’ni problemy polityky: zbirnyk naukovykh prats’, Odesa, Feniks Publ, 2011, Vypusk 43., pp. 92−98. 11. “Fol’hero ta inshi proty Norvehiyi.” [Folgerø & Others v Norway] Rishennya Yevropeys’koho sudu z prav lyudyny vid 29 chervnya 2007 r. (zayava № 15472/02). Available at: http://hudoc. echr. coe. int. 12. “Khasan Eylem Zenhin proty Turtsiyi”. [Hasan and Eylem Zengin v.Tyrcey] vid 14 lypnya 2006 r. Rishennya Yevropeys’koho sudu z prav lyudyny vid (zayava № 1448/04). Available at: http://hudoc. echr. coe. int

Bibliography: 
Vìsn. Nac. unìv. “Lʹvìv. polìteh.”, Ser.: Ûrid. nauki, 2016; 845(10): 454–459