RIGHT OF APPEAL OF AGREEMENT ABOUT CONFESSION OF GUILTINESS BY PERSON THAT IS NOT ITS PARTICIPANT

V. Navrotska
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Full text PDF151.83 KB
Abstract: 
Attention is concentrated on contradiction of norms of Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine, one of that gives a right of appeal of sentence on the basis of agreement only to the defendant and public prosecutor, and in other - it is marked a right on the revision of sentence, constrained rights, freedoms or interests of cramps of higher level by any person, regardless of her participating in a judicial trial. It is well-proven that companions in a crime, criminal proceeding in relation to that is distinguished separately there are legal subjects on the appeal of sentence on the basis of agreement even then, when they did not participate in its conclusion.
References: 

1. Vyrok Pechers’koho rayonnoho sudu m. Kyyeva vid 04.03.2015 [Judgement of Pecherskyy Regional Court of Kiev City of March 3, 2015]. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Rewiew/42987287 2. Ukhvala Apelyatsiynoho sudu m. Kyyeva vid 17.04.2015. [Decision of the Court of Appeal of Kiev City of April 4, 2015]. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Rewiew/43794624 3. Ukhvala Vyshchoho spetsializovanoho sudu Ukrayiny z roz·hlyadu tsyvil’nykh i kryminal’nykh sprav vid 24.07.2015. [Decision of Higher Specialized Court of Ukraine of July 24, 2015]. Available at:
http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Rewiew/47464651 4. Ukhvala Vyshchoho spetsializovanoho sudu Ukrayiny z rozhlyadu tsyvil’nykh i kryminal’nykh sprav vid 09.06.2016. [Decision of Higher Specialized Court of Ukraine of June 9, 2016]. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Rewiew/58300768 5. Postanova Vyshchoho spetsializovanoho sudu Ukrayiny z roz·hlyadu tsyvil’nykh i kryminal’nykh sprav vid 03.03.2016. [Ruling of Higher Specialized Court of Ukraine of March 3, 2016]. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Rewiew/56939749 6. Postanova Plenumu VSSU vid 11.12.2015 №13 “Pro praktyku zdiysnennya sudamy kryminal’noho provadzhennya na pidstavi uhod” [Ruling of Supreme Court of Ukraine of December 11, 2015, №13] // Chasopys tsyvil’noho i kryminal’noho sudochynstva. – 2016. – № 1. – S. 8–24 7. Zapyt Heneral’noho prokurora Ukrayiny prava na oskarzhennya uhody pro vyznannya vynuvatosti osoboyu, yaka ne ye yiyi uchasnykom № 101112-26071-15 vid 09.08.2016 [Inquiry of General Prosecutor of Ukraine of August 9, 2016, № 101112-26071-15] 8. Ukhvala Yaltyns’koho mis’koho sudu
Avtonomnoyi Respubliky Krym vid 17.10.2013 roku (№sudovoyi spravy 121/8795/13-k; № provadzhennya 1-kp/121/475/13). [Decision of the Yalta City Court of Krimea Republic of October 17, 2013, Case № 121/8795/13-k]. – Available at: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua 9. Ukhvala Kryukivs’koho rayonnoho sudu m. Kremenchuka Poltavs’koyi oblasti vid 22.03.2013 roku (№ sudovoyi spravy 537/1326/13-k) [Decision of the Kryukivskyy Regional Court of Kremenchuk City of March 22, 2013]. – Available at: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua 10. Ukhvala Kryukivs’koho rayonnoho sudu m. Kremenchuka Poltavs’koyi
oblasti vid 22.03.2013 roku (№ sudovoyi spravy 537/1327/13-k; № provadzhennya 1kp/537/84/2013) [Decision of the Kryukivskyy Regional Court of Kremenchuk City of March 22, 2013, Case № 537/1327/13-k]. – Available at: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua.

Bibliography: 
Vìsn. Nac. unìv. “Lʹvìv. polìteh.”, Ser.: Ûrid. nauki, 2016; 855(12): 515–521