LEXICAL AND GRAMMATICAL VARIATIONS OF LAW CONCEPTOSPHERE

The article examines lexical and grammatical variations of law conceptosphere that reflect the linguistic conceptual picture of the world. The law conceptosphere includes, respectively, concepts from the field of law such as the concept of law, justice, judiciary, etc.. Language is rightly called one of the means that explain spirituality of a man, its system of values, mentality, the way of thinking, the process of generating ideas, outlook, behavior. It is the language that defines the way of the division of the world into one culture or another, the way of its description, interpretation. It is through the language that a man describes categories of law, interprets the law. Language in law is not just a matter of legal technique and stylistics, it is a constructive basis for the existence of law as a kind of social phenomenon. Legal norms are fixed verbally, so in-depth knowledge about the properties of a word allows you to grasp the logic of legal thinking, more deeply understand the systematic construction of law and the mechanisms of its action on the consciousness and behavior. The key words of law are always considered to be “signals” of certain legal philosophy expressing spiritual and ethical ideals of the society and moral principles recognized by human mentality, perceived bylegal system and verbalized in language. The language reflects the sense of justice and deformations occurring in the society. The change of principles that constitute the understanding of law is followed by the change of legal language and there is the appearance of certain lexical and grammatic alvariations, since new keywords gain their specific meanings and other possibilities of syntactic building. Nowadays reality is known to activate again the problem of transformation of legal language. Current legislation, jurisprudence and the practice of application of law operate the terms “priority rights and freedoms of an individual and a citizen”, “power sharing” “business activities “, etc. At the same time legal language is able to carry out an opposite effect on the legal system of the society.