Error message

  • Deprecated function: Unparenthesized `a ? b : c ? d : e` is deprecated. Use either `(a ? b : c) ? d : e` or `a ? b : (c ? d : e)` in include_once() (line 1439 of /home/science2016/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in include_once() (line 3557 of /home/science2016/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).

THE IDEA OF “INDIVIDUALITY”: PHILOSOPHICAL AND LEGAL CONCEPT

I. Smirnovа
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Full text PDF151.28 KB

Keywords:

Abstract: 
In the article the essence of the definition of “identity” as a complex multi-faceted and multi-level structure, the meaning of which depends not only on the wealth of natural its premises, but also the depth and breadth of its entry into the mechanism of public relations, as well as the degree of social activity, reflecting sub of the object as individual. The researcher examined the defining idea of “individuality” in the philosophical and legal terms, the proposed methodological concept on the designated problems.
References: 

1. Tugarinov V. P. Lichnost’ i obshchestvo [The individual and society]. Moscow: Thought, 1965. 191 p. 2. Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia,1989. 840 p. 3. Rezvitskiy I. I. Lichnost’. Individual’nost’. Obshchestvo : Problema individualizatsii i ee sotsial’no-filosofskiy smysl [Personality. Individuality. Society: The problem of individualization and its social and philosophical meaning]. Moscow: Politizdat, 1984. 141 p. 4. Titarenko A. I. Antiidei. Opyt sotsial’no-eticheskogo analiza [Experience in social and ethical analysis]. Moscow: Politizdat, 1976. 482 p. 5. Khabermas Yu. Ponyatie individual’nosti [The concept of individuality]. Problems of Philosophy. 1989. Vol. 2. pp. 35–40. 6. Nitsshe F. Tak govoril Zaratustra : sochineniya [Thus Spoke Zarathustra: works]. Moscow, 1989. T. 2. 627 p. 7. Batkin L. M. Ital’yanskoe Vozrozhdenie v poiskakh individual’nosti [The Italian Renaissance in the search for identity]. Moscow:
Nauka, 1989. 272 p. 8. Shinkaruk V. I. Gumanizm dialektiko-materialisticheskogo mirovozzreniya [Humanism dialectical materialist worldview]. Kiev: Ukraine Politizdat, 1984. 256 p. 9. Veber M. Protestants’ka etika і dukh kapіtalіzmu [The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism]. Kyiv: Fundamentals, 1994. 261 p. 10. Marks K. Kapital: sochineniya [Capital: Works]. At 30 tons. Moscow: Hospolytyzdat, 1961. T. 23. 908 p. 11. Harasymiv T. Z. Pryrodni ta sotsial’ni determinanty formuvannya
deviantnoyi povedinky lyudyny: filosofs’ko-pravovyy vymir [Natural and social determinants of formation of deviant human behavior, philosophical and legal aspects: monograph]. Lviv, Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, 2012.420 p. 12. Harasymiv T. Z. Osoba v konteksti sotsial’noho ta indyvidual’noho: dialektyka vzayemodiyi [The person on the social and individual: the dialectic interaction]. Scientific Bulletin of Lviv State University of Internal Affairs. Coll. Science. works. A series of legal. Lviv: LvDUVS, 2009. Vol. 3. pp. 347–356. 13. Marks K. Ekonomichesko-filosofskie rukopisi 1844 goda: sochineniya [Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844: the works]. In 50 t. Moskva, 1954–1981. T. 42. 536 p.

Bibliography: 
Vìsn. Nac. unìv. “Lʹvìv. polìteh.”, Ser.: Ûrid. nauki, 2016; 855(12): 235–258