Error message

  • Deprecated function: Unparenthesized `a ? b : c ? d : e` is deprecated. Use either `(a ? b : c) ? d : e` or `a ? b : (c ? d : e)` in include_once() (line 1439 of /home/science2016/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in include_once() (line 3557 of /home/science2016/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Unparenthesized `a ? b : c ? d : e` is deprecated. Use either `(a ? b : c) ? d : e` or `a ? b : (c ? d : e)` in include_once() (line 1439 of /home/science2016/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in include_once() (line 3557 of /home/science2016/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).

THE LEGAL INTERPRETATION OF A REGIONAL ACCESS IN FORMATION OF THE TERRITORIAL MECHANISM OF UKRAINE

I. Mahnovskyi
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Full text PDF162.87 KB

Keywords:

Abstract: 
Іn the article in legal aspect considered regional approach of reforming of the territorial mechanism of Ukraine, as one of the possible options for improvement. Highlighted understanding such multifold category as region. With a glance to historical experience, modern political realities and future prospects, tend was valid for the optimizing of the territorial mechanism of Ukraine, including the feasibility of consolidation of administrative units by the formation of prorated regions. Defined territorial enlargement and consolidation of regional boundaries by the individual criterions: historical and political; socio-economic; geographic and climatic; ethnic and national-cultural. Brought the element of the aggregated potential of the region: labor, consumer, infrastructural, productive, innovation, financial, institutional and natural resources. Stated that the regionalization of the territorial mechanism of Ukraine has optimized and decentralized nature and will allow effectively realize national policy in the country, coupled with the development of government and provide proportional socio-economic and cultural elaborateness of the regions preserve their identity and ensure political stability in society in general. The introduction and expansion of the process of regionalization in Ukraine will contribute to further deepening democratization of society.
References: 

1. Karas’ A. Dyskursyvne rozriznennya sotsial’nykh intentsiy na shlyakhu do hromadyans’koho suspil’stva v Ukrayini [Discursive distinctions of social intentions on the way to a civil society in Ukraine]. Civil society and social transformation in Ukraine. Lviv, Tsentr LNU im. Ivan Franko? 2001, pp. 64–78. 2. Kolosok T.S. Tolerantnist’ yak kryteriy aktyvnoho dialohu kul’tur [Tolerance as a criterion for active dialogue of cultures]. Actual problems of philosophical, political and religious studies: proceedings of the international. Sciences. Conf., Kiev, 2004, рр. 492–494. 3. Aryyoshy A. Kontrol’ za dvyzhenyem kapytala:opыt stran po eho vvedenyyu y otmene (Control over the movement of capital: the experience of countries in his introduction and cancellation), Moscow, Whole World Publ., 2001, 134 р. 4. Nalyvayko T. V. Hromads’kyy kontrol’ v Ukrayini yak instytut hromadyans’koho suspil’stva: teoretyko-pravovyy aspekt. Kand, Diss. [Public control in Ukraine as an Institute of civil society: theoretical and legal aspect. Kand, Diss,]. Lviv, 2010, 17 р. 5. Boyko N.L. Іnformatyzatsyya y perspektyvы demokratyzatsyy obshchestva (k voprosu o novыkh vozmozhnostyakh sotsyal’noho kontrolya) (Informatization and prospects of democratization of the society (the question of new possibilities of social control)). Sociology in the context of contemporary social change. Vol. 2, 2003, рр. 98–103. 6. Entsyklopedychnyy slovnyk z derzhavnoho upravlinnya [Encyclopedic dictionary of public administration]. Kiev, 2010, р. 120. 7. Pro hromads’kyy kontrol’ [About public control] the project the law of Ukraine on April 11, 2014. Availadle at: http: // rada.gov.ua. 8. Kratkyy slovar’ po sotsyolohyy [A concise dictionary of sociology]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 2001, 479 р. 9. Aberkombi N. Sociologicheskij slovar’ [Sociological dictionary]. Kazan, publishing house of Kazan. University, 2000, 420 р. 10. Anglіjs’ko-ukraїns’kij slovnik termіnіv і ponjat’ z derzhavnogo upravlіnnja [English-Ukrainian dictionary of terms and concepts of public administration]. Kiev, The Basics Publ., 1996, 128 р. 11. Sotsiolohiya: korotkyy entsyklopedychnyy slovnyk [Sociology: a short encyclopedia]. Kiev, Ukr. the center of spiritual culture, 1998, 736 р. 12. Yurydychna entsyklopediya: V 6 t. [Legal encyclopedia: In 6 volumes]. Kiev, 1998, Т. 1: А – G, 672 p. 13. Krupnyk A.S. Hromads’kyy kontrol’: sutnist’ ta mekhanizmy zdiysnennya (Public control: essence and implementation mechanisms). On-line collection of scientific papers of the oripa NAPA under the President of Ukraine, Vol. 1, 2007. Availadle at: http: // novyi-stryi.at.ua/gromkontrol/ KRUPNYK_A_pro_grom_kontrol.pdf. 14. Horpynych O.V. Sotsial’na robota yak faktor formuvannya hromadyans’koho suspil’stva Kand, Diss. [Social work as a factor of formation of civil society. Kand, Diss,]. Кiеv, 2005, 18 р. 15. Bragina L. M.
Grazhdanskij gumanizm v tvorchestve Matteo Pal’mieri [Civil humanism in the works of Matteo Palmieri]. Moscow, Izd-vo an SSSR, 1981, Vol. 44, 340 р. 16. Korkh O. M. Problema indyvidualizmu (istorykofilosofs’kyy analiz) Kand, Diss. [The problem of individualism (historical-philosophical analysis) Kand, Diss.]. Dnepropetrovsk, 2002, 33 р. 17. Potrubach N.N. Social’no-jekonomicheskaja bezopasnost’ sociuma (Socio-economic security of the society). Socially-humanitarian knowledge, 2001, Vol. 3, рр. 153–167.

Bibliography: 
Vìsn. Nac. unìv. “Lʹvìv. polìteh.”, Ser.: Ûrid. nauki, 2016; 855(12): 79–85