Error message

  • Deprecated function: Unparenthesized `a ? b : c ? d : e` is deprecated. Use either `(a ? b : c) ? d : e` or `a ? b : (c ? d : e)` in include_once() (line 1439 of /home/science2016/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in include_once() (line 3557 of /home/science2016/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Unparenthesized `a ? b : c ? d : e` is deprecated. Use either `(a ? b : c) ? d : e` or `a ? b : (c ? d : e)` in include_once() (line 1439 of /home/science2016/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in include_once() (line 3557 of /home/science2016/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).

PRACTICE ARGUMENTATIVE IN THE TRIAL: TO FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM

O. Chornobay
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Full text PDF235.74 KB

Keywords:

Abstract: 
Taking into account the principle of competition on which the trial takes place, and also often decisive role in its human factor, consider specific features of the judicial reasoning, characteristic of each participant of the legal discourse. The exceptional accent is placed on the rhetorical aspect of argumentative practice, used in legal proceedings, when fully opened of the participants meaning in the process of solving the case.
References: 

1. Kozyubra M. I. Modeli (typy) yurydychnoyi arhumentatsiyi [Models (types) of legal argumentation] / M. Kozyubra // Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Yurydychni nauky. 2013. T. 144–145. pp. 3–8. 2.Yasynok M. M. Sudovi debaty : pravo, psykholohiya, rytoryka [Judicial debate : law, psychology, rhetoric] : monohrafiya / M.M. Yasynok. Kyyiv : Alerta, 2014. 156 p. 3. Velykyy entsyklopedychnyy yurydychnyy slovnyk [Large encyclopedic legal dictionary] / za red. Yu. S. Shemshuchenka. Kyyiv : TOV Vydavnytstvo “Yurydychna dumka”, 2007. 992 p. 4. Aleksandrov A. S. Dispozitiv dokazyvanija i argumentacija v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Dispositif of evidence and argumentation in criminal proceedings] / A.S. Aleksandrov // Rosijskij ezhegodnik teorii prava. 2008. № 1. pp. 478–491. 5. Khomenko Iryna. Neformal'na lohika ta arhumentatyvne mirkuvannya [Informal logic and argumentative reasoning] / Iryna Khomenko // Filosofs'ka dumka. 2016. № 3. pp. 34–46 6. Oliynyk Ol'ha. Mystetstvo sudovykh debativ [Art of judicial debates] : navch. posibnyk / Ol'ha Oliynyk. Kyyiv : Kondor, 2010. 258 p. 7. Kryminal'ne protsesual'ne pravo Ukrayiny [Criminal judicial law of Ukraine] : navch. posibnyk / za red. V. H. Honcharenka ta V. A. Kolesnyka. Kyyiv : Yustynian, 2014. 576 p. 8. Oliynyk O. B. Osoblyvosti yurydychnoyi rytoryky prokurora yak profesiynoho uchasnyka sudovoho protsesu [Features of legal prosecutor's rhetoric as a professional participant of trial] / O. B. Oliynyk // Universytet·s'ki naukovi zapysky. 2010. Vyp. 2. pp. 236–242. 9. Kravchuk Volodymyr. Vyklyuchne pravo advokata na
predstavnytstvo v sudi [The exceptional right of a lawyer to representation in court] / Volodymyr Kravchuk // Visnyk Vyshchoyi kvalifikatsiynoyi komisiyi suddiv Ukrayiny. 2016. №2. pp. 2–7.

Bibliography: 
Vìsn. Nac. unìv. “Lʹvìv. polìteh.”, Ser.: Ûrid. nauki, 2016; 850(11): 300–306