Error message

  • Deprecated function: Unparenthesized `a ? b : c ? d : e` is deprecated. Use either `(a ? b : c) ? d : e` or `a ? b : (c ? d : e)` in include_once() (line 1439 of /home/science2016/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in include_once() (line 3557 of /home/science2016/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).

PROOF (EVIDENCE) AND REFUTATION AS TYPES OF ARGUMENTATION

O. Chornobai
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Full text PDF198.43 KB

Keywords:

Abstract: 
Specialists in industry of communicative linguistics, logic, eristic consider that proof (evidence) as a logical and methodological form of scientific cognition in the broadest sense is the process of establishing objective truth through practical and theoretical actions and tools. In a narrow interpretation, bringing called reasoning that establishes the truth of certain allegations by pointing to other allegations, the truth of which is already proven.
References: 

1. Hladuns’kyy V. N. Lohika [Logic] : pidruchnyk dlya studentiv vyshchykh navchal’nykhzakladiv / V. N. Hladuns’kyy. L’viv : Afisha, 2005. 320 p. 2. Ivin A. A. Argumentacii teorija. Argumentacija. Argumentacija kontekstual’naja. Argumentacija teoreticheskaja. Argumentacija jempiricheskaja [Argumentation theory. Argumentation. The contextual argumentation. The theoretical argumentation. The empirical argumentation] / A. A. Ivin // Filosofija : jenciklopedicheskij slovar’ / pod red. A.A. Ivina.
Moskva : Gardariki, 2006. pp. 57–59; 59–60; 60–62; 62–63; 63–64. 3. Oliynyk Ol’ha. Mystetstvo sudovykh debativ [Art of judicial debates] : navch. posibnyk / Ol’ha Oliynyk. Kyiv : Kondor, 2010. 258 p. 4. Sumarokova L. M. Osnovy lohiky [The basics of logic] : navch. posibnyk dlya yuryd. vuziv / L. M. Sumarokova. Odesa : Feniks, 2011. 236 p. 5. Khomenko I. V. Erystyka [Eristic] : pidruchnyk / I. V. Khomenko. Kyiv : Tsentr pravovoyi literatury, 2008. 280 p.

Bibliography: 
Vìsn. Nac. unìv. “Lʹvìv. polìteh.”, Ser.: Ûrid. nauki, 2016; 855(12): 264–273