Error message

  • Deprecated function: Unparenthesized `a ? b : c ? d : e` is deprecated. Use either `(a ? b : c) ? d : e` or `a ? b : (c ? d : e)` in include_once() (line 1439 of /home/science2016/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in include_once() (line 3557 of /home/science2016/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).

CONCEPT HUMAN PERSONALITY IN THE PHILOSOPHICAL AND LAW SCHOOL

T. Harasymiv, A. Volohina
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Full text PDF143.16 KB
Abstract: 
In the article the concept of human personality built on the basic ideas of the leading right-wing philosophical schools. We consider the notion of "personalism" and the characteristics of its importance in contemporary philosophy. Researched historical basis and development of ideas of personalism and personalistic analyzes the major trends taking into account the characteristics of their basic philosophical concepts of representatives. The methods and the most important categories which uses existentialism in the interpretation of the rights and specificity of its existence. The analysis of scientific and philosophical study on the development of phenomenology concept personality.
References: 

1. Sotsial’na filosofiya : korotkyy entsyklopedychnyy slovnyk [Social Philosophy: short encyclopaedic dictionary]. By the Society. ed. V. P. Andrushchenko, M. I. Horlatch etc.]. Kyiv; Kharkov: Rubicon,1997. 398 p. 2. Mounier E. Traide du caractere [Traide du caractere].Ocuvres.Vol. 2.741 p. 3. Mun’e E. Manifest personalizma [Manifest personalism]. Moscow, 1999. 559 p. 4. Vdovina I. S. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya [New Encyclopedia of Philosophy]. 4t. Moscow, 2001. Vol. 2. pp. 621–622. 5. Malyshev B. T. Chelovecheskaya lichnost’ i ee proyavlenie [Human personality and its manifestation]. Moskow, 1964. 75 p. 6. K’erkegor S. Bolezn’ k smerti [Sickness Unto Death]. Ethical Thought. Moscow, 1990. pp. 361–370. 7. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: spravochnoe izdanie [New Encyclopedia of Philosophy: reference book]. Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences; National public and Science Foundation;In the 4 ton; Scientific. Ed. Mikhail Kovalev and dr. Moskva: Thought 2001. T. 4. pp. 241–245. 8. Prekhtl’ P. Vvedenie v fenomenologiyu Gusserlya [Critique of Pure Reason]. (Trans. Lossky with options first. in Russian. and Europe. Lang; ros. Acad. Sciences, Institute of Philosophy). SPb., 1993. 654 p. 9. Scheler M. Der Formalismus in der Ethik und dic materiale Ucertethik Gessammel – te werke [Der Formalismus in der Ethik und dic materiale Ucertethik Gessammel – te werke]. Bern, 1954. B.II. pp. 393–394. 10. Bokhenskiy Yu. M. Sovremennaya evropeyskaya filosofiya [Modern European Philosophy]. Moscow, 2000. 256 p.

Bibliography: 
Vìsn. Nac. unìv. “Lʹvìv. polìteh.”, Ser.: Ûrid. nauki, 2016; 855(12): 168–172