Error message

  • Deprecated function: Unparenthesized `a ? b : c ? d : e` is deprecated. Use either `(a ? b : c) ? d : e` or `a ? b : (c ? d : e)` in include_once() (line 1439 of /home/science2016/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in include_once() (line 3557 of /home/science2016/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Unparenthesized `a ? b : c ? d : e` is deprecated. Use either `(a ? b : c) ? d : e` or `a ? b : (c ? d : e)` in include_once() (line 1439 of /home/science2016/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in include_once() (line 3557 of /home/science2016/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).

PUNISHMENT OF LIMITATION OF WILL CAN BE REFORMED (EXPERIENCE OF REPUBLIC OF BELARUS)

K. Marysyuk
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Full text PDF153.45 KB

Keywords:

Abstract: 
The article is sanctified to the analysis of punishment of limitation of will without direction a person to the attendance centre of open type in Republic of Belarus. In accordance with the current legislation of Republic of Belarus, taking into account the face of guilty, character and degree of public danger of person, that committed crime, presence for it of permanent residence, a court can award punishment of limitation of will without direction a person in the attendance centre of open type. Convict to punishment of limitation of will without direct a person to the attendance centre of open type punishments leave at the place of permanent residence. Limitation of will without direction a person in the attendance centre of open type can be awarded punishment, when correction guilty can be attained without his moving away from the place of permanent residence: in family, labour collective, in educational establishment. The obligatory condition of application to the winy mentioned type of punishment is bringing in of him to labour.
References: 

1. Mіnіmal’nі standartnі pravila Organіzacії Ob’єdnanih Nacіj stosovno zahodіv, ne pov’jazanih іz tjuremnim uv’jaznennjam (Tokіjs’kі pravila) 1990 r. [Standard Minimum Rules for Non-custodial Measures (The Tokyo Rules)], Donec’k, Doneckij Memorial Publ., 2003. 16 p. (In Ukrainian) 2. Kulinich S. Obmezhennja volі jak vid pokarannja, pov’jazane z obmezhennjam osobistoї svobodi bez іzoljacії vіd suspіl’stva [Limitation of will as a kind of the punishment related tolimitation of the personal freedom without an isolation from society], Vіsnyk prokuratury, 2007, vol. 6, pp. 67–70(In Ukrainian). 3. Lisodєd O. Pitannja vikonannja pokarannja u vidі obmezhennja volі [A question of implementation of punishment in the type of limitation of will]. Problemy zakonnostі, 2007, Vol. 88, pp. 139–145(In Ukrainian). 4. Ponomarenko O. Obmezhennja volі jak vid pokarannja v Ukraїnі: іstorichnij aspekt (20–21 stolіttja) [Limitation of will as type of punishment in Ukraine: historical aspect]. Naukovyj chasopys Nacіonal’noi akademіi Prokuratury Ukrayini, 2014, Vol. 1, pp. 132–138 (In Ukrainian). 5. O vnesenii izmenenij i dopolnenij v Ugolovnyj, Ugolovno-processual’nyj i Ugolovno-ispolnitel’nyj kodeksy Respubliki Belarus’ po voprosam sovershenstvovanija porjadka ispolnenija nakazanij i inyh mer ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti. Zakon Respubliki Belarus’ ot 09 ijunja 2006 g. № 122-Z [About making alteration and additions to Criminal, Criminally-processual and Criminally-executive codes of Republic of Belarus on questions of perfection of order of execution of punishments and another measures of criminal responsibility]. Available at: pravo.newsby.org/belarus/zakon0/z841.htm (In Russian). 6. O praktike naznachenija sudami nakazanija v vide ogranichenija svobody. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Belarus’ ot 20 dekabrja 2007 g. № 18 [About practice of setting courts of punishment as limitation of freedom]. Available at: http://court.by/jurisprudence/Post_plen/criminal/toco/d888bc558790c352.html (In Russian). 7. Ob utverzhdenii Koncepcii sovershenstvovanija sistemy mer ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti i porjadka ih ispolnenija. Ukaz Prezidenta Respubliki Belarus’ ot 23 dekabrja 2010 g. N 672 [About claim of Conception of perfection of the system of measures of criminal responsibility and order of their execution]. Available at: http://pravo.levonevsky.org/bazaby11/republic03/text584.htm (In Russian). 8. Zheleznaja L. Ogranichenie svobody kak jelement mehanizma ugolovno-pravovoj ohrany [Limitation of will as element of mechanism of criminal-law guard]. Sbornik materialov II Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii “Ugolovnaja politika Respubliki Belarus’: sostojanie i puti sovershenstvovanija”, Baranovichi, BarGU Publ., 2016, pp. 66–68 (In Russian). 9. Barkov L. Ogranichenie svobody v sovremennom ugolovnom zakonodatel’stve stran SNG [Limitation of will in the modern criminal statute of CIS countries]. Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija Pravo, 2012, Vol. 29 (283), pp. 48–52 (In Russian). 10. Ugolovno-ispolnitel’nyj kodeks Respubliki Belarus’. Zakon Respubliki Belarus’ ot 11 janvarja 2000 g. № 365-Z [Criminally-executive code of Republic of Belarus]. Minsk, Nacional’nyj centr pravovoj informacii respubliki Belarus’. Publ. 2014, 224 p. (In Russian).

Bibliography: 
Vìsn. Nac. unìv. “Lʹvìv. polìteh.”, Ser.: Ûrid. nauki, 2016; 855(12): 510–514